Re: [patch 2.6.27-rc7] gpiolib: request/free hooks

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Magnus Damm
Date: Sunday, September 28, 2008 - 8:48 pm

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:29 AM, David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:

Hm, sounds like you prefer to keep pinmuxing and GPIO code separated?


In the SuperH case GPIO pin direction selection is done in the same
way as selecting pin function. So in and out directions can be seen as
two pin functions. And since we want to support GPIO pin direction we
may as well support setting pin functions as well.

But maybe there are better ways to integrate it, I'm not sure.


Sounds good.


Thank you!

/ magnus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 2.6.27-rc7] gpiolib: request/free hooks, David Brownell, (Wed Sep 24, 3:08 pm)
Re: [patch 2.6.27-rc7] gpiolib: request/free hooks, Magnus Damm, (Sat Sep 27, 8:00 am)
Re: [patch 2.6.27-rc7] gpiolib: request/free hooks, David Brownell, (Sat Sep 27, 11:29 am)
Re: [patch 2.6.27-rc7] gpiolib: request/free hooks, Magnus Damm, (Sun Sep 28, 8:48 pm)
Re: [patch 2.6.27-rc7] gpiolib: request/free hooks, David Brownell, (Mon Sep 29, 10:21 am)
Re: [patch 2.6.27-rc7] gpiolib: request/free hooks, David Brownell, (Sun Oct 5, 9:57 pm)