Re: [PATCH] x86: mtrr_cleanup hole size should be less than half of chunk_size v2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Sunday, September 28, 2008 - 2:10 am

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

Gabriel, can you check tip/mater too?
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/readme.txt

from
reg00: base=0xd0000000 (3328MB), size= 256MB: uncachable, count=1
reg01: base=0xe0000000 (3584MB), size= 512MB: uncachable, count=1
reg02: base=0x00000000 (   0MB), size=4096MB: write-back, count=1
reg03: base=0x100000000 (4096MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1
reg04: base=0x120000000 (4608MB), size= 128MB: write-back, count=1
reg05: base=0x128000000 (4736MB), size=  64MB: write-back, count=1
reg06: base=0xcf600000 (3318MB), size=   2MB: uncachable, count=1

you should get
Found optimal setting for mtrr clean up
gran_size: 1M   chunk_size: 16M         num_reg: 7      lose RAM: 0M
range0: 0000000000000000 - 00000000d0000000
Setting variable MTRR 0, base: 0MB, range: 2048MB, type WB
Setting variable MTRR 1, base: 2048MB, range: 1024MB, type WB
Setting variable MTRR 2, base: 3072MB, range: 256MB, type WB
hole: 00000000cf600000 - 00000000cf800000
Setting variable MTRR 3, base: 3318MB, range: 2MB, type UC
rangeX: 0000000100000000 - 000000012c000000
Setting variable MTRR 4, base: 4096MB, range: 512MB, type WB
Setting variable MTRR 5, base: 4608MB, range: 128MB, type WB
Setting variable MTRR 6, base: 4736MB, range: 64MB, type WB

instead of

reg00: base=0x00000000 (   0MB), size=2048MB: write-back, count=1
reg01: base=0x80000000 (2048MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1
reg02: base=0xc0000000 (3072MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1
reg03: base=0xcfe00000 (3326MB), size=   2MB: uncachable, count=1
reg04: base=0x100000000 (4096MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1
reg05: base=0x120000000 (4608MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1
reg06: base=0x12c000000 (4800MB), size=  64MB: uncachable, count=1

YH
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: mtrr_cleanup hole size should be less tha ..., Yinghai Lu, (Sun Sep 28, 2:10 am)