On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 17:15 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
quoted text > > These are just the regular printk levels. If your old printk used a
> > particular level, have the kmsg_xxx printk use the same level. The
> > question about message severity and message documenation are
> > independent, aren't they?
>
> Yes, but since it's a new message API, I thought you might have an idea. It's
> hard for authors (eg. me) to know which level to use. As a result, levels
> currently seem to be chosen randomly.
>
> If you felt inspired to rationalize them, it would let us clean that up as
> things moved to kmsg :)
Urgs, you are after a sort of definition what the differences is between
a warning, an error, an alert, etc is, aren't you?
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 1/6] kmsg: tagged kernel messages. , Martin Schwidefsky , (Sat Sep 27, 4:16 pm)