"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> writes:I don't know the ICH 8/9/10 very well but it seems typical, i.e., the flash is a X Mbit device usually mapped at some really high address and then copied/decompressed to RAM ("shadow ROM" at the usual locations 0xC0000 for VGA, 0xF0000 or so for system BIOS, something between the two for Ethernet PXE). Is the protection you write about the hardware flash region protection? It can be easily removed by another command (another write). Anyway the problem in question is EEPROM, not flash? I'm sure that simply erasing the PXE flash region would not prevent the machine from booting. The BIOS requires a valid signature (55AA or so) at the start of a BIOS extension block, and there is a checksum. I also think that blindly erasing some regions of flash, or blindly writing to it wouldn't kill the machine completely - there is a boot block which is almost certainly protected (requires a command to unblock). The boot block should notice the main BIOS image is corrupted and should allow reflashing (using a DOS diskette and perhaps without VGA output). -- Krzysztof Halasa --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| David Newall | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Andrew Morton | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Dale Farnsworth | Re: [PATCH 01/39] mv643xx_eth: reverse topological sort of functions |
