Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Krzysztof Halasa
Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008 - 11:45 am

"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> writes:


I don't know the ICH 8/9/10 very well but it seems typical, i.e., the
flash is a X Mbit device usually mapped at some really high address
and then copied/decompressed to RAM ("shadow ROM" at the usual
locations 0xC0000 for VGA, 0xF0000 or so for system BIOS, something
between the two for Ethernet PXE).

Is the protection you write about the hardware flash region
protection? It can be easily removed by another command (another
write).

Anyway the problem in question is EEPROM, not flash?


I'm sure that simply erasing the PXE flash region would not prevent
the machine from booting. The BIOS requires a valid signature (55AA or
so) at the start of a BIOS extension block, and there is a checksum.

I also think that blindly erasing some regions of flash, or blindly
writing to it wouldn't kill the machine completely - there is a
boot block which is almost certainly protected (requires a command to
unblock). The boot block should notice the main BIOS image is
corrupted and should allow reflashing (using a DOS diskette and
perhaps without VGA output).
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 6:50 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Chris Snook, (Thu Sep 25, 6:58 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:01 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:04 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:09 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:09 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:10 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:10 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:10 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:11 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:11 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:12 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:12 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 7:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Brandeburg, (Thu Sep 25, 10:44 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Thu Sep 25, 11:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Sep 26, 12:12 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Karsten Keil, (Fri Sep 26, 12:19 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Sep 26, 4:49 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Karsten Keil, (Fri Sep 26, 7:23 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Barnes, (Fri Sep 26, 10:52 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Barnes, (Fri Sep 26, 11:23 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Barnes, (Fri Sep 26, 11:39 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Barnes, (Fri Sep 26, 11:43 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Tim Gardner, (Fri Sep 26, 11:53 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Krzysztof Halasa, (Fri Sep 26, 3:04 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Fri Sep 26, 3:23 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Fri Sep 26, 5:05 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Tim Gardner, (Fri Sep 26, 9:20 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sat Sep 27, 11:45 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 8:52 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 9:20 am)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Mon Sep 29, 9:24 am)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 10:18 am)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 10:36 am)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 3:43 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, James Courtier-Dutton, (Sat Oct 18, 12:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Sat Oct 18, 3:49 pm)