Re: [patch] ioremap sanity check to catch mapping requests exceeding the BAR sizes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Cox
Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008 - 9:25 am

On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:43:55 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:


On system memory mapped by the kernel which I assume is what you mean -
the BIOS is often shadowed system memory and we have platforms where
memory pages not mapped into or managed the OS are ioremap() targets.

That however is getting pedantic - I just didn't want anyone to overdo
the sanity checks

Alan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch] ioremap sanity check to catch mapping requests ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Sep 27, 12:16 am)
Re: [patch] ioremap sanity check to catch mapping requests ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Sep 27, 7:43 am)
Re: [patch] ioremap sanity check to catch mapping requests ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Sep 27, 9:17 am)
Re: [patch] ioremap sanity check to catch mapping requests ..., Alan Cox, (Sat Sep 27, 9:25 am)
Re: [patch] ioremap sanity check to catch mapping requests ..., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Sep 27, 12:24 pm)