Re: [RFC] 0/11 fanotify: fscking all notifiction and file access system (intended for antivirus scanning and file indexers)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <malware-list@...>, <arjan@...>, <bunk@...>, <tytso@...>, <tvrtko.ursulin@...>, <alan@...>, <hch@...>, <andi@...>, <viro@...>, <peterz@...>, <Jonathan.Press@...>, <riel@...>
Date: Saturday, September 27, 2008 - 2:05 am

On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Eric Paris wrote:


sending a message out for every READ/WRITE seems like it will generate a 
LOT of messages, and very few will be ones that anyone cares about.

one of the nice things about the TALPA approach was that there was an 
ability to notify only on a change of state (i.e. when a file that had 
been scanned was changed)

this could do a similar thing, but I think it would be a much more 
expensive process to do it all in userspace.

David Lang

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] 0/11 fanotify: fscking all notifiction and file ac..., , (Sat Sep 27, 2:05 am)