Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Greg KH
Date: Friday, September 26, 2008 - 1:19 pm

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 04:11:49PM -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:

Um, it's the same, the taint is decoded automatically for you, no need
to strain any brain cells trying to figure it out :)

If people really want a prefix, sure, I have no objection, that's simple
to add.


5 drivers "graduated" last release cycle, so it will happen.


Agreed.


No, that was one of the requirements that came out of the discussions at
the kernel summit, I'm going to leave both the warning and the modalias
and taint flag there, sorry.

If you really don't like it, just never enable any of these modules,
you'll never be bothered by it.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Parag Warudkar, (Wed Sep 24, 4:39 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Randy Dunlap, (Wed Sep 24, 6:03 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Parag Warudkar, (Wed Sep 24, 7:59 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Paul Mundt, (Wed Sep 24, 10:27 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Parag Warudkar, (Thu Sep 25, 4:02 am)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Randy Dunlap, (Thu Sep 25, 7:49 am)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Randy Dunlap, (Thu Sep 25, 10:53 am)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Randy Dunlap, (Thu Sep 25, 2:04 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Parag Warudkar, (Thu Sep 25, 2:40 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Stefan Richter, (Thu Sep 25, 2:51 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Parag Warudkar, (Thu Sep 25, 3:22 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Stefan Richter, (Fri Sep 26, 11:36 am)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Parag Warudkar, (Fri Sep 26, 1:11 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Greg KH, (Fri Sep 26, 1:19 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Stefan Richter, (Fri Sep 26, 1:39 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Parag Warudkar, (Fri Sep 26, 1:47 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Parag Warudkar, (Fri Sep 26, 1:56 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Leon Woestenberg, (Fri Sep 26, 2:00 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Stefan Richter, (Fri Sep 26, 3:46 pm)
Re: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging), Andrew Morton, (Thu Oct 9, 2:17 pm)