Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Greg KH
Date: Friday, September 26, 2008 - 1:09 pm

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 07:19:52PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:

apparmor requires patches to core parts of the kernel in order for it to
work.  This is for stand-alone drivers/filesystems/whatever only.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Sep 24, 9:34 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Alexey Dobriyan, (Wed Sep 24, 12:36 pm)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Sep 24, 2:05 pm)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Sitsofe Wheeler, (Thu Sep 25, 12:49 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Sitsofe Wheeler, (Thu Sep 25, 1:26 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Arkadiusz Miskiewicz, (Fri Sep 26, 10:19 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Greg KH, (Fri Sep 26, 1:09 pm)