On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted text > >
> > You could also fallback on a 2-level page array when buffer size is >
> > 64MB. The cost is mainly a supplementary pointer dereference, but one
> > more should not make sure a big difference overall.
>
> I'm still not sure why we don't just link the pages using the page
> frames, we don't need the random access, do we?
Hmm, but this does make changing the buffer size much easier. I'll think
about it and perhaps try it out. If I can tidy it up nicer than the
ftrace code, then I may include it for v1.
-- Steve
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC PATCH v4] Unified trace buffer , Steven Rostedt , (Fri Sep 26, 3:47 am)