Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tilman Schmidt
Date: Friday, September 26, 2008 - 2:50 am

Christoph Hellwig schrieb:


Tsk. Tsk. Insults are no substitute for arguments.


s/solved/transformed into an even harder one/

Before throwing out something used on production systems you
have to have a working replacement solution. Yes, I know, people
are working on that, but "being worked on" !=3D "working".

HTH
T.

--=20
Tilman Schmidt                    E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Unge=F6ffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe R=FCckseite)
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Sep 24, 9:34 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Alexey Dobriyan, (Wed Sep 24, 12:36 pm)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Sep 24, 2:05 pm)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Sitsofe Wheeler, (Thu Sep 25, 12:49 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Sitsofe Wheeler, (Thu Sep 25, 1:26 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Tilman Schmidt, (Fri Sep 26, 2:50 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Arkadiusz Miskiewicz, (Fri Sep 26, 10:19 am)