login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
September
»
26
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...>
To: Chris Snook <csnook@...>
Cc: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...>, <agospoda@...>, Ronciak, John <john.ronciak@...>, Allan, Bruce W <bruce.w.allan@...>, Graham, David <david.graham@...>, <kkiel@...>, <tglx@...>, <chris.jones@...>, <arjan@...>
Subject:
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
Date: Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 10:04 pm
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Chris Snook wrote:
quoted text
> Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: > > hardware affected: > > laptops and desktops with 82566 or 82567 based LAN parts, which are machines > > with the ICH8 and ICH9 chipsets and a variety of processors. > > The machines I know of that have reported the issue include > > Lenovo X300 > > HP 2510p > > Intel DP35JO > > Lenovo T61 (possibly) > > Lenovo X61 (possibly) > > My Intel DG45ID board has an ICH10R chipset, and it also has an 82567LM, just > as some of the affected systems. Is there some reason why ICH10 is not > susceptible, or have we simply not seen it?
ICH10R with 82567 is also susceptible, as far as I know at this point. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 9:50 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, James Courtier-Dutton
, (Sat Oct 18, 3:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Sat Oct 18, 6:49 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Karsten Keil
, (Fri Sep 26, 3:19 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Brandeburg
, (Fri Sep 26, 1:44 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:01 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Karsten Keil
, (Fri Sep 26, 10:23 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:13 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Sep 26, 7:49 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri Sep 26, 1:52 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:23 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Tim Gardner
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:53 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Fri Sep 26, 8:05 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Tim Gardner
, (Sat Sep 27, 12:20 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Fri Sep 26, 6:04 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Fri Sep 26, 6:23 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Sat Sep 27, 2:45 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:39 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jesse Barnes
, (Fri Sep 26, 2:43 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 11:52 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 12:20 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Mon Sep 29, 12:24 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 1:18 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 1:36 pm)
RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Jiri Kosina
, (Mon Sep 29, 6:43 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:13 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:12 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:12 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:11 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:11 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:10 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:10 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:10 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:09 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:09 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Sep 26, 3:12 am)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Chris Snook
, (Thu Sep 25, 9:58 pm)
Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Thu Sep 25, 10:04 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Linus Torvalds
Linux 2.6.27-rc5
Jared Hulbert
[PATCH 00/10] AXFS: Advanced XIP filesystem
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Linus Torvalds
Linux 2.6.27-rc8
git
:
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Mark McLoughlin
[PATCH] bridge: make bridge-nf-call-*tables default configurable
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
4 users
and
942 guests
online.
Online users
zeekec
strcmp
plussizelingeri
honeyairtuz
Syndicate