Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...>

Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...>, <agospoda@...>, Ronciak, John <john.ronciak@...>, Allan, Bruce W <bruce.w.allan@...>, Graham, David <david.graham@...>, <kkiel@...>, <tglx@...>, <chris.jones@...>, <arjan@...>

Subject: Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status

Date: Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 9:58 pm

Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
quoted text> hardware affected:
> laptops and desktops with 82566 or 82567 based LAN parts, which are 
> machines with the ICH8 and ICH9 chipsets and a variety of processors.
> The machines I know of that have reported the issue include
> Lenovo X300
> HP 2510p
> Intel DP35JO
> Lenovo T61 (possibly)
> Lenovo X61 (possibly)

My Intel DG45ID board has an ICH10R chipset, and it also has an 82567LM, just as 
some of the affected systems.  Is there some reason why ICH10 is not 
susceptible, or have we simply not seen it?

-- Chris
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 9:50 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, James Courtier-Dutton, (Sat Oct 18, 3:13 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Sat Oct 18, 6:49 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Karsten Keil, (Fri Sep 26, 3:19 am)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Brandeburg, (Fri Sep 26, 1:44 am)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 10:01 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Karsten Keil, (Fri Sep 26, 10:23 am)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Fri Sep 26, 2:13 am)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Sep 26, 7:49 am)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Barnes, (Fri Sep 26, 1:52 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Barnes, (Fri Sep 26, 2:23 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Tim Gardner, (Fri Sep 26, 2:53 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Fri Sep 26, 8:05 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Tim Gardner, (Sat Sep 27, 12:20 am)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Krzysztof Halasa, (Fri Sep 26, 6:04 pm)

RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Fri Sep 26, 6:23 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sat Sep 27, 2:45 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Barnes, (Fri Sep 26, 2:39 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jesse Barnes, (Fri Sep 26, 2:43 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 10:13 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 11:52 am)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 12:20 pm)

RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Mon Sep 29, 12:24 pm)

RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 1:18 pm)

RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 1:36 pm)

RE: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Sep 29, 6:43 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 10:13 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 10:12 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 10:11 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 10:10 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 10:09 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Sep 26, 3:12 am)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Chris Snook, (Thu Sep 25, 9:58 pm)

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Thu Sep 25, 10:04 pm)


linux-kernel:
Jan Engelhardt	intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Linus Torvalds	Linux 2.6.25-rc4
Jon Smirl	Re: 463 kernel developers missing!
git:

linux-netdev:
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Jarek Poplawski	Re: HTB accuracy for high speed
David Miller	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc:

Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status

Online users