Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 6:31 am

On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 02:23:50PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

Sorry for the late answer.

That's fine for me.


cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Aug 19, 6:47 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Tue Aug 19, 7:13 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Aug 19, 7:32 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Aug 19, 8:05 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Greg Ungerer, (Sun Aug 24, 11:16 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the broken COMEMPCI ..., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Fri Aug 29, 12:31 am)
[2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Aug 31, 9:10 am)
[2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the eLIA support, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Aug 31, 9:10 am)
[2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the unused PCI option, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Aug 31, 9:10 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Wed Sep 3, 12:22 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Sat Sep 6, 5:23 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Jesse Barnes, (Mon Sep 8, 10:06 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Tue Sep 9, 12:11 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Sep 25, 6:31 am)