Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Greg KH
Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 7:48 pm

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:07:59PM +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote:

"we" are working hard to remove any and all barriers for modules to be
out-of-tree.  See the recent drivers/staging/ announcement, I can now
take pretty much any code that at least builds and works for someone,
and get it into the kernel tree where it can be properly cleaned up and
cared for over time before it moves to the "correct" location within the
kernel.

What kernel modules do you currently use/rely on that are not in the
main kernel tree?  Do you have links to them?  I'd be glad to add them.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Sep 24, 9:34 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Alexey Dobriyan, (Wed Sep 24, 12:36 pm)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Sep 24, 2:05 pm)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Greg KH, (Wed Sep 24, 7:48 pm)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Sitsofe Wheeler, (Thu Sep 25, 12:49 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Sitsofe Wheeler, (Thu Sep 25, 1:26 am)
Re: [kernel-abi] symbol versioning vs. out-of-tree modules., Arkadiusz Miskiewicz, (Fri Sep 26, 10:19 am)