Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » September » 24

Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering technique

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino <lcapitulino@...>
To: <hamid.jahanjou@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering technique
Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 9:56 am

Em Thu, 04 Sep 2008 15:34:30 +0330
"Hamid R. Jahanjou" <hamid.jahanjou@gmail.com> escreveu:

| From: Hamid R. Jahanjou
| 
| Implements the idea of swap-out page clustering from *BSD for
| Linux. Each time a candidate page is to be swapped out,
| virtually-nearby pages are scanned to find eligible pages to be
| swapped out too as a cluster. This technique increases the likelihood of
| bringing in related data on a page fault and decreases swap space
| fragmentation in the long run. Currently, Linux searches only
| physically-nearby pages which is not optimal since, over time, physically-
| adjacent pages may become unrelated.
| 
| The code can be statically tuned. No benchmarks. I'm not sure whether
| the added complexity is acceptable.

 Sorry for this (very) late response, but I ran some very simple tests
this week and thought you might be interested in the results.

 The test machine has 512MB of RAM. For the tests I booted with 64MB
and setup a 512MB swap file.

 For the first test I let an allyesconfig kernel building for several
hours with six jobs (make -j6). I did not have any problems, so
considering that your code was used I think it is stable enough.

 In the second test I have built an allnoconfig kernel with and without
your patches, still with six jobs. Results:

	2.6.27-rc7-vanilla   44:12 minutes
	2.6.27-rc7-pgc       52:09 minutes

 (pgc means page-clustering patches).

 For both builds I did not change any swap paramenter and I could
observe that about 80MB of swap were used most of the time.

 But please, note that these tests were quite far from being 'scientific'
eg. I should have built the kernel more times and should have tried other
setups...

 I will wait for the next version of the patches to run more serious
tests.

-- 
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering technique, Hamid R. Jahanjou, (Thu Sep 4, 8:04 am)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino..., (Wed Sep 24, 9:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Li Yu, (Sun Sep 7, 11:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., hamidreza jahanjou, (Mon Sep 8, 5:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 5, 5:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Hamid R. Jahanjou, (Fri Sep 5, 4:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 5, 3:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Rik van Riel, (Sat Sep 6, 1:42 am)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Zan Lynx, (Sun Sep 7, 8:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Rik van Riel, (Sun Sep 7, 8:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Hamid R. Jahanjou, (Wed Sep 10, 4:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Ray Lee, (Wed Sep 10, 1:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Rik van Riel, (Wed Sep 10, 1:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Andrew Morton, (Thu Sep 4, 7:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Hamid R. Jahanjou, (Fri Sep 5, 3:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Andrew Morton, (Fri Sep 5, 2:58 am)
Re: [PATCH] VM: Implements the swap-out page-clustering tech..., Rik van Riel, (Thu Sep 4, 7:14 pm)