that was fast! :)
i've created a new -tip topic for your new tracer: tip/tracing/fastboot.
That topic is based on the tip/tracing/ftrace + tip/fastboot trees.
Note that i've done a couple of small changes to your patches:
- i've done the following renames:
:1,$s/INITCALL_TRACER/BOOT_TRACER/g
:1,$s/trace_initcall/trace_boot/g
:1,$s/initcall_trace/boot_trace/g
the reasoning: we eventually want to extend this new tracer to all
things "bootup delay", not just initcalls - hence calling it an
'initcall tracer' would be too limiting.
The goal is to help the Arjan's fastboot project to achieve 5 seconds
to-GUI bootup times like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7NxCM8ryF8
[ Even if you know what a 5 seconds bootup is, you've got to check
this "From Naught to Sixty in 5 seconds" video ;-) ]
- there were a few overlong lines in the commit logs and in the Kconfig
desciption - i fixed them up. You should check your email client and
your editor for line length settings - currently you seem to have no
line breaks at all.
- I also corrected a few capitalization things in commit subject lines
and corrected a few minor coding style errors - you can avoid these
by running scripts/checkpatch.pl over your patches. Nothing overly
serious - but you should diff against tip/master to see what the
changes are.
yes, it's necessary to keep that backwards compatibility.
i've integrated tip/tracing/fastboot into tip/master and have started
testing it. It passed the basic tests already so i've just pushed out
the new tip/master. Please double-check that i have not messed up the
rename or the integration somewhere.
all in one, nice stuff!
Ingo
--