Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Sitsofe Wheeler
Date: Monday, September 22, 2008 - 11:33 pm

Ingo Molnar wrote:

I do not appear to have the CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD option in 
2.6.27rc7. Is it an option that is only in -tip ?

-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Fri Sep 19, 4:54 am)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Sep 19, 7:20 am)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Sep 22, 5:07 am)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Mon Sep 22, 11:33 pm)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Tue Sep 23, 9:30 am)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Tue Sep 23, 12:39 pm)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Tue Sep 23, 3:01 pm)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Sun Sep 28, 1:56 pm)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Mon Sep 29, 4:11 pm)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Tue Sep 30, 6:18 am)