On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:36:19AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:21:12 +0200
> Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this patch series implements stackable dma_ops on x86. This is useful
> > to be able to fall back to a different dma_ops implementation if one
> > can not handle a particular device (as necessary for example with
> > paravirtualized device passthrough or if a hardware IOMMU only
> > handles a subset of available devices).
> 
> isn't the right answer here to have a per device DMA ops instead ?

Its implemented using the per-device dma-ops already there. With this
patches there is a list of available dma_ops implementations which are
asked in a particular order if they can handle the device. The first
implementation which returns true is assigned to the device as the
per-device dma_ops structure.

(Hmm, maybe the name stackable is misleading, is "dma_ops multiplexing"
 better?)

Joerg

-- 
           |           AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
 Operating |         Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
 System    |                  Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
 Research  |              General Partner authorized to represent:
 Center    |             AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
           | General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/