On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted text
> [Yinghai Lu - Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 02:57:17AM -0700]
> | >
> | > Actually it's resend of the patch. On previous attempt
> | > Yinghai was proposed to choose:
> | >
> | >> one apic_version or boot_cpu_apic_version could be enough
> | >
> | > but I think it should be different patch which does cleaning
> | > up variables usage. So for now I think _this_ patch is enough
> | > since idea is to prevent of touching nonexistant register rather
> | > code cleaning (whci could be done later).
> |
> | do we have systems that have mixed cpu supported with different apic version?
> |
> | YH
> |
>
> Yinghai what was the reason of this question? I've a suspicious
> you're planning to test apic version early and only _once_ so
> eliminating APIC_INTERGRATED call? Am I right?

want to put more thing in genapic...

YH
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/