Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Matt Keenan
Date: Sunday, September 21, 2008 - 1:56 pm

On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 22:18 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:

[snip snip]

If you use ALSA you could write a custom .asoundrc file and increase
ALSA's default buffer size, this gives the hardware a longer buffer to
play which may work around the problem. This used to do the trick for me
with the old scheduler with slow machines. Not a fix but if nothing else
works...

Matt

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Wed Sep 17, 2:18 pm)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Wed Sep 17, 2:28 pm)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Sep 17, 2:34 pm)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Matt Keenan, (Sun Sep 21, 1:56 pm)
Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?, Sitsofe Wheeler, (Sun Sep 21, 11:50 pm)