Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » September » 20

Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: David Miller
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure.
Date: Saturday, September 20, 2008 - 1:00 pm

From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 09:02:09 -0700


Absolutely wrong.

On a per-flow basis you want to push the work down as far
as possible down to individual cpus.  Why do you think the
hardware folks are devoting silicon to RX multiqueue facilities
that spread the RX work amongst available cpus using MSI-X?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Fri Sep 19, 11:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 20, 8:29 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Sep 20, 8:45 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 20, 9:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Sep 20, 9:19 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 20, 10:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Sep 20, 11:09 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Daniel Walker, (Sat Sep 20, 11:52 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sat Sep 20, 12:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sat Sep 20, 1:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sat Sep 20, 1:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Herbert Xu, (Sat Sep 20, 11:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sat Sep 20, 11:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., James Courtier-Dutton, (Sun Sep 21, 2:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Sun Sep 21, 2:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Steffen Klassert, (Sun Sep 21, 2:46 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Herbert Xu, (Mon Sep 22, 1:23 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Ilpo Järvinen, (Mon Sep 22, 3:36 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Steffen Klassert, (Mon Sep 22, 6:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Chris Friesen, (Mon Sep 22, 2:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Mon Sep 22, 3:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Chris Friesen, (Tue Sep 23, 10:03 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Tom Herbert, (Tue Sep 23, 2:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Tue Sep 23, 2:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., Herbert Xu, (Tue Sep 23, 9:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure., David Miller, (Wed Sep 24, 12:42 am)