Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/5] cgroup: block device i/o controller (v9)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...>, Paul Menage <menage@...>, <randy.dunlap@...>, Carl Henrik Lunde <chlunde@...>, Divyesh Shah <dpshah@...>, <eric.rannaud@...>, <fernando@...>, <akpm@...>, <agk@...>, <subrata@...>, <axboe@...>, Marco Innocenti <m.innocenti@...>, <containers@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <dave@...>, <matt@...>, <roberto@...>, <ngupta@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2008 - 2:06 pm

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 06:07:32PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:

Hi Andrea,

I was checking out the pass discussion on this topic and there seemed to
be two kind of people. One who wanted to control max bandwidth and other
who liked proportional bandwidth approach  (dm-ioband folks).

I was just wondering, is it possible to have both the approaches and let
users decide at run time which one do they want to use (something like
the way users can choose io schedulers).

Thanks
Vivek
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/5] cgroup: block device i/o controller..., Hirokazu Takahashi, (Wed Sep 17, 3:18 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/5] cgroup: block device i/o controller..., Hirokazu Takahashi, (Thu Sep 18, 7:24 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/5] cgroup: block device i/o controller..., Vivek Goyal, (Tue Sep 2, 2:06 pm)