Re: [PATCH] x86: x86_{phys,virt}_bits field also for i386 (v3)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Friday, September 19, 2008 - 4:32 pm

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

IMO we should change it to use #if instead of #ifdef.  The transition 
problem has been discussed elsewhere.

	-hpa

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: x86_{phys,virt}_bits field also for i386 (v3), Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Sep 18, 11:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: x86_{phys,virt}_bits field also for i386 (v3), Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Sep 19, 2:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: x86_{phys,virt}_bits field also for i386 (v3), H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Sep 19, 4:32 pm)