* Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:

quoted text
> It seems we have two "none" tracers now. Why not seeing this nop 
> tracer as an improvment of the current "none tracer" ?
> 
> As a result the none tracer contained in trace.c could be replaced by 
> this new one as the default tracer. And that's said, that will enable 
> trace_printk by default even when no tracer is selected by the user.
> 
> What do you think about it?

hmm ... good idea. There are some special properties of the none tracer 
(it inhibits trace output for example), and those should be discontinued 
i guess.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/