Please pull from 'new-drivers' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git new-drivers to receive the following updates: Documentation/networking/LICENSE.qlge | 46 + MAINTAINERS | 20 + drivers/net/Kconfig | 39 + drivers/net/Makefile | 4 + drivers/net/atlx/Makefile | 2 + drivers/net/atlx/atl2.c | 3127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/atlx/atl2.h | 530 +++++ drivers/net/enic/Makefile | 5 + drivers/net/enic/cq_desc.h | 79 + drivers/net/enic/cq_enet_desc.h | 169 ++ drivers/net/enic/enic.h | 115 + drivers/net/enic/enic_main.c | 1949 ++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/enic/enic_res.c | 370 +++ drivers/net/enic/enic_res.h | 151 ++ drivers/net/enic/rq_enet_desc.h | 60 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_cq.c | 89 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_cq.h | 113 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_dev.c | 674 ++++++ drivers/net/enic/vnic_dev.h | 106 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_devcmd.h | 282 +++ drivers/net/enic/vnic_enet.h | 47 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_intr.c | 62 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_intr.h | 92 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_nic.h | 65 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_resource.h | 63 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_rq.c | 199 ++ drivers/net/enic/vnic_rq.h | 204 ++ drivers/net/enic/vnic_rss.h | 32 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_stats.h | 70 + drivers/net/enic/vnic_wq.c | 184 ++ drivers/net/enic/vnic_wq.h | 154 ++ drivers/net/enic/wq_enet_desc.h | 98 + drivers/net/jme.c | 3019 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/net/jme.h | 1199 ++++++++++ drivers/net/qlge/Makefile | 7 + drivers/net/qlge/qlge.h | 1593 +++++++++++++ ...
Also, there is still a net-next batch outstanding to be pulled, which is totally unrelated to the recently-rejected fixes push: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=122135907115163&w=2 I will have the updated 2.6.27-rc fixes push to you today. Jeff --
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> So, new-drivers destined for net-2.6 right? Just making sure :-) --
I based it on top of net-next for 2.6.28, but can easily retarget it for net-2.6... Jeff --
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Since I really want to concentrate on killing as many regression list network driver entries as possible, I'd much rather: 1) You concentrate on building that net-2.6 bug fix tree for me 2) I pull these new drivers into net-next-2.6 for now and we can think about putting these into net-2.6 for a subsequent push to Linus, rather than the current one. Sound good to you? --
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Pulled, thanks Jeff. I'll push this to net-next-2.6 after a quick build sanity test. --
Hi,
with new enic driver I get the following build error on i386 (config attached):
CC [M] drivers/net/enic/vnic_cq.o
drivers/net/enic/vnic_cq.c: In function 'vnic_cq_init':
drivers/net/enic/vnic_cq.c:65: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'
make[2]: *** [drivers/net/enic/vnic_cq.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/net/enic] Error 2
make: *** [_module_drivers/net] Error 2
Something like patch below (borrowed from net/s2io.h, ok to use it?) fixes it:
--- linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/enic/vnic_dev.h.orig 2008-09-19 13:57:43.000000000 -0300
+++ linux-2.6.27/drivers/net/enic/vnic_dev.h 2008-09-19 14:00:57.000000000 -0300
@@ -23,6 +23,26 @@
#include "vnic_resource.h"
#include "vnic_devcmd.h"
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#ifndef readq
+static inline u64 readq(void __iomem *addr)
+{
+ u64 ret = 0;
+ ret = readl(addr + 4);
+ ret <<= 32;
+ ret |= readl(addr);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+#endif
+#ifndef writeq
+static inline void writeq(u64 val, void __iomem *addr)
+{
+ writel((u32) (val), addr);
+ writel((u32) (val >> 32), (addr + 4));
+}
+#endif
+
#ifndef VNIC_PADDR_TARGET
#define VNIC_PADDR_TARGET 0x0000000000000000ULL
#endif
--
[]'s
Herton
