Re: dmaengine.c: question about device_alloc_chan_resources

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Haavard Skinnemoen
Date: Thursday, September 18, 2008 - 7:45 am

Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com> wrote:

I guess so. What would be even more simple is to simply prevent other
clients from taking a channel once someone has acked it, which would be
perfect for my purposes, but perhaps not everyone else's...

How common is for several clients to use the same channel anyway
though? Wouldn't you risk stalling the network stack if the md subsystem
has submitted a large xor operation on the same channel that the
network stack was about to use?

Haavard
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: dmaengine.c: question about device_alloc_chan_resources, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Thu Sep 18, 7:28 am)
Re: dmaengine.c: question about device_alloc_chan_resources, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Thu Sep 18, 7:45 am)
Re: dmaengine.c: question about device_alloc_chan_resources, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Thu Sep 18, 8:00 am)
Re: dmaengine.c: question about device_alloc_chan_resources, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Fri Sep 19, 4:25 am)
Re: dmaengine.c: question about device_alloc_chan_resources, linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Fri Sep 19, 7:50 am)
Re: dmaengine.c: question about device_alloc_chan_resources, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Sun Sep 21, 2:26 am)
Re: dmaengine.c: question about device_alloc_chan_resources, Guennadi Liakhovetski, (Sun Sep 21, 12:50 pm)
Re: dmaengine.c: question about device_alloc_chan_resources, Haavard Skinnemoen, (Mon Sep 22, 12:44 am)