Re: [PATCH 2.6.27-rc5 resubmit] Fix itimer/many thread hang.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thursday, September 18, 2008 - 3:23 am

* Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> wrote:


i'd not worry about those 160 bytes - getting this stuff to work fine is 
far more important. Details around threading seem to be one of the 
slowest converging technological details of Linux.

a silly question:


why is there _any_ assymetry needed between UP and SMP? These days we 
just write straight code for SMP, and UP is just a single-CPU 
special-case of it. _Sometimes_ if it's really worth it we do some UP 
special cases but it's the exception, not the rule.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] timers: fix itimer/many thread hang, fix, Ingo Molnar, (Sun Sep 14, 8:07 am)
Re: [PATCH 2.6.27-rc5 resubmit] Fix itimer/many thread hang., Roland McGrath, (Sun Sep 14, 12:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2.6.27-rc5 resubmit] Fix itimer/many thread hang., Roland McGrath, (Wed Sep 17, 12:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2.6.27-rc5 resubmit] Fix itimer/many thread hang., Ingo Molnar, (Thu Sep 18, 3:23 am)