KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
I tried one version, but before trying a pre-allocation version, I wanted to
spread out the radix-tree and try and the results seemed quite impressive. We
can still do pre-allocation, but it gets more complicated as we start supporting
all memory models. I do have a design on paper, but it is much more complex than
this.
> BTW, I already have lazy-lru-by-pagevec protocol on my patch(hash version) and
cool! Please do post what numbers you see as well. I would appreciate if you can
try this version and see what sort of performance issues you see.
--
Balbir
--
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Andy Whitcroft | clam |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
