Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alessio Sangalli
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 10:55 pm

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:


Well... I have to check but I think the cache memory is anyway faster
than this, and this memory is not cacheable. But, you definitely have a
point. I'll check with some hardware guy tomorrow morning.

bye!
as

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Mon Sep 15, 1:35 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Dooks, (Tue Sep 16, 2:35 am)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:39 am)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Nizette, (Tue Sep 16, 3:27 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 3:49 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Nizette, (Tue Sep 16, 4:04 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 4:52 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Sep 16, 7:42 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:27 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Sep 16, 10:39 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:55 pm)