Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alessio Sangalli
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 10:27 pm

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:


Well I should ask the details to the hardware engineers but it's like a
separate channel than the one used for main memory. It is not cacheable
either. To the CPU, it just appears to be mapped at some location on the
addressable space. Accessing this TCM will not have any impact on main
memory access, so bursts etc won't be interrupted; other than that, TCM
has double the bandwidth than standard memory - but it's tiny in size,
something like 8 to 32kB as I mentioned earlier.

Hope I was clear enough, feel free to ask me more details if you need

bye
as

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Mon Sep 15, 1:35 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Dooks, (Tue Sep 16, 2:35 am)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:39 am)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Nizette, (Tue Sep 16, 3:27 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 3:49 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Nizette, (Tue Sep 16, 4:04 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 4:52 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Sep 16, 7:42 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:27 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Sep 16, 10:39 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:55 pm)