Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ben Nizette
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 3:27 pm

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:39 -0700, Alessio Sangalli wrote:

I'd feel uncomfortable about picking an arbitrary function for the TCM
to accomplish.  Why don't you just set up a genalloc on that RAM and let
the user use it for what they will?

If a driver needs a quick FIFO it can attempt to get the RAM for said
FIFO from the genalloc and fall back to main memory otherwise.  Simple,
flexible, easy :-)

	--Ben.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Mon Sep 15, 1:35 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Dooks, (Tue Sep 16, 2:35 am)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:39 am)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Nizette, (Tue Sep 16, 3:27 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 3:49 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Nizette, (Tue Sep 16, 4:04 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 4:52 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Sep 16, 7:42 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:27 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Sep 16, 10:39 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:55 pm)