Re: [PATCH -next] blkdev.h: fix warnings when CONFIG_BLOCK=n

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 3:16 pm

Hi Al,

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:50:40 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
_device' declared inside parameter list
only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
sk' declared inside parameter list
ometry' declared inside parameter list
ned int,

I suspect this is caused by commit
44e95e9e8be95ec9ac6b0678e491883d99c0cfd8 ("beginning of methods
conversion") from your bdev tree. (the commit id is from next-20090816)

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for September 16, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Sep 16, 12:34 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 16, Takashi Iwai, (Tue Sep 16, 11:00 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 16 (cpustr.h), Randy.Dunlap, (Tue Sep 16, 11:50 am)
[PATCH -next] blkdev.h: fix warnings when CONFIG_BLOCK=n, Randy.Dunlap, (Tue Sep 16, 12:29 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 16 (cpustr.h), H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Sep 16, 1:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH -next] blkdev.h: fix warnings when CONFIG_BLOCK=n, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Sep 16, 3:16 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 16 (cpustr.h), Randy Dunlap, (Fri Sep 19, 1:28 pm)