Re: linux-next: Tree for September 16

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Takashi Iwai
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 11:00 am

At Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:34:15 +1000,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Thanks for a quick action!
This can help to reduce bisection time when a regression is known to
be on a certain subsystem tree.


Takashi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for September 16, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Sep 16, 12:34 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 16, Takashi Iwai, (Tue Sep 16, 11:00 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 16 (cpustr.h), Randy.Dunlap, (Tue Sep 16, 11:50 am)
[PATCH -next] blkdev.h: fix warnings when CONFIG_BLOCK=n, Randy.Dunlap, (Tue Sep 16, 12:29 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 16 (cpustr.h), H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Sep 16, 1:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH -next] blkdev.h: fix warnings when CONFIG_BLOCK=n, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Sep 16, 3:16 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for September 16 (cpustr.h), Randy Dunlap, (Fri Sep 19, 1:28 pm)