Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alessio Sangalli
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 10:39 am

Ben Dooks wrote:


I disagree, something like a TCM can very well be present in any
architecture, after all it's some kind of fast memory mapped to an
address, nothing special from a software point of view. I will ask on
the ARM mailing list however.



I think I will write a module that implements a software FIFO. One
function to allocate a FIFO n words deep, a "push" and a "pop" and
similar. The calling module will have to setup the FIFO and use it
probably in ISRs or similar (the policy will totally remain in the
caller module). Any comments on such approach?

bye
Alessio
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Mon Sep 15, 1:35 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Dooks, (Tue Sep 16, 2:35 am)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:39 am)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Nizette, (Tue Sep 16, 3:27 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 3:49 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Ben Nizette, (Tue Sep 16, 4:04 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 4:52 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Sep 16, 7:42 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:27 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Tue Sep 16, 10:39 pm)
Re: Driver for tightly coupled memory, Alessio Sangalli, (Tue Sep 16, 10:55 pm)