Re: [RFC 4/4] switch non-standard SYSCALL_VECTOR allocation to use vector_irq[]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 8:42 am

* Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com> wrote:


please use __grab_irq_vector() to standard return type: -EINVAL (or 
-EBUSY) on failure, vector on success. That will get rid of the 'ret == 
false' ugliness too.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86_64: (NEW) Dynamically allocate arch speci ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Aug 11, 12:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86_64: (NEW) Dynamically allocate arch speci ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Aug 11, 12:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86_64: (NEW) Dynamically allocate arch speci ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Aug 11, 1:10 pm)
Re: [RFC 4/4] switch non-standard SYSCALL_VECTOR allocatio ..., Ingo Molnar, (Sun Sep 14, 8:42 am)
Re: [RFC 0/4] dynamically allocate arch specific system ve ..., Dimitri Sivanich, (Wed Sep 17, 10:30 am)
Re: [RFC 0/4] dynamically allocate arch specific system ve ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Sep 17, 11:59 am)
Re: [RFC 0/4] dynamically allocate arch specific system ve ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Sep 17, 3:15 pm)
Re: [RFC 0/4] dynamically allocate arch specific system ve ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Sep 18, 5:28 pm)