Re: [PATCH] e100: Use pci_pme_active to clear PME_Status and disable PME#

Previous thread: [PATCH] posix-timers: kill ->it_sigev_signo and ->it_sigev_value by Oleg Nesterov on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 8:32 am. (1 message)

Next thread: [PATCH] hugetlb: call arch_prepare_hugepage() for surplus pages by Gerald Schaefer on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 8:29 am. (5 messages)
From: Alessandro Guido
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 8:30 am

[please cc me on replies]

I'm getting this error message when booting my laptop.

The commit that causes this is:

commit eb9d0fe40e313c0a74115ef456a2e43a6c8da72f
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:   Mon Jul 7 03:34:48 2008 +0200

    PCI ACPI: Rework PCI handling of wake-up

[very long commit message snipped]

Should I ignore that?
--

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 1:03 pm

The message is harmless, but it exposes the problem that e100_probe() should
not use pci_enable_wake() for this purpose.

The appended patch makes it use pci_pme_active() instead.

Thanks,
Rafael

---
PCI PM: Export pci_pme_active to drivers

Export pci_pme_active() to drivers, so that they can clear the
PME_status bit and disable PME# for the device without involving
ACPI.

Modify the e100 driver to use pci_pme_active() for this purpose.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 drivers/net/e100.c  |    4 +---
 drivers/pci/pci.c   |    3 ++-
 include/linux/pci.h |    1 +
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ bool pci_pme_capable(struct pci_dev *dev
  * The caller must verify that the device is capable of generating PME# before
  * calling this function with @enable equal to 'true'.
  */
-static void pci_pme_active(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
+void pci_pme_active(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
 {
 	u16 pmcsr;
 
@@ -1945,6 +1945,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_set_power_state);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_save_state);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_restore_state);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_pme_capable);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_pme_active);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_wake);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_target_state);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_prepare_to_sleep);
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/pci.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/pci.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ int pci_restore_state(struct pci_dev *de
 int pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state);
 pci_power_t pci_choose_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pm_message_t state);
 bool pci_pme_capable(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state);
+void pci_pme_active(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable);
 int pci_enable_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, ...
From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008 - 9:47 am

I can take the pci_pme_active bits, but the e100 stuff should go in through 
Jeff probably.  Care to respin?

Thanks,
Jesse
--

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008 - 3:00 pm

Sure, in replies to this message.

Thanks,
Rafael
--

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008 - 3:14 pm

PCI PM: Export pci_pme_active to drivers

Export pci_pme_active() to drivers, so that they can clear the
PME_status bit and disable PME# for their devices without involving
ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 drivers/pci/pci.c   |    3 ++-
 include/linux/pci.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ bool pci_pme_capable(struct pci_dev *dev
  * The caller must verify that the device is capable of generating PME# before
  * calling this function with @enable equal to 'true'.
  */
-static void pci_pme_active(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
+void pci_pme_active(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
 {
 	u16 pmcsr;
 
@@ -1941,6 +1941,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_set_power_state);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_save_state);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_restore_state);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_pme_capable);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_pme_active);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_wake);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_target_state);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_prepare_to_sleep);
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/pci.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/pci.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -641,6 +641,7 @@ int pci_restore_state(struct pci_dev *de
 int pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state);
 pci_power_t pci_choose_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pm_message_t state);
 bool pci_pme_capable(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state);
+void pci_pme_active(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable);
 int pci_enable_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state, int enable);
 pci_power_t pci_target_state(struct pci_dev *dev);
 int pci_prepare_to_sleep(struct pci_dev *dev);
--

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008 - 3:18 pm

e100: Use pci_pme_active to clear PME_Status and disable PME#

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

---
 drivers/net/e100.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/e100.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/net/e100.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/e100.c
@@ -2738,9 +2738,7 @@ static int __devinit e100_probe(struct p
 		nic->flags |= wol_magic;
 
 	/* ack any pending wake events, disable PME */
-	err = pci_enable_wake(pdev, 0, 0);
-	if (err)
-		DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "Error clearing wake event\n");
+	pci_pme_active(pdev, false);
 
 	strcpy(netdev->name, "eth%d");
 	if((err = register_netdev(netdev))) {
--

From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 1:15 pm

Since I am rusty on my PCI...  why is this needed?


--

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 4:44 pm

Because we just want to clear PME_Status and disable PME#, but
pci_enable_wake() involves an ACPI call and generally depends on the
dev->power.can_wakeup and dev->power.should_wakeup flags being set.

The patch I sent here http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122096638020191&w=4
has a better changelog.

Thanks,
Rafael
--

From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008 - 3:34 pm

Cool, applied.  Thanks Rafael.

Jesse
--

Previous thread: [PATCH] posix-timers: kill ->it_sigev_signo and ->it_sigev_value by Oleg Nesterov on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 8:32 am. (1 message)

Next thread: [PATCH] hugetlb: call arch_prepare_hugepage() for surplus pages by Gerald Schaefer on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 - 8:29 am. (5 messages)