Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » September » 12

Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Roland McGrath
Subject: Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you
Date: Friday, September 12, 2008 - 3:39 pm

> It was allocating too much memory, which is harmless.

Didn't it also write NT_PRFPREG notes of the wrong size?


Thanks,
Roland
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, Roland McGrath, (Thu Sep 11, 7:57 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Sep 12, 1:23 am)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, Paul Mundt, (Fri Sep 12, 6:05 am)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, Russell King, (Fri Sep 12, 6:13 am)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, David Miller, (Fri Sep 12, 2:57 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, Roland McGrath, (Fri Sep 12, 3:31 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, David Miller, (Fri Sep 12, 3:37 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, Roland McGrath, (Fri Sep 12, 3:39 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, David Miller, (Fri Sep 12, 3:40 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, Roland McGrath, (Fri Sep 12, 3:45 pm)
Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you, Roland McGrath, (Mon Sep 15, 1:38 pm)