On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, David Sanders wrote:
quoted text
>
> Well, I thought we determined that multibyte nops were causing virtual pc to 
> die and removing them made it work fine.  Then why do I see this
> $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep nopl
> 
> flags           : fpu vme pse tsc msr pae cx8 sep pge cmov acpi mmx fxsr sse 
> sse2 constant_tsc up nopl lahf_lm
>              
> It seems the detection code in common.c is saying nops are supported.  Huh?

Because the _native_ CPU handles them quite well.

quoted text
> SO I ran this code:

.. in user space.

The thing is, afaik, Virtual PC will happily let the CPU execute all the 
user-space instructions, and thus they all work as well as if they were 
running on real hardware - since they _do_ run on real hardware.

But it is probably the case that Virtual PC will then do some "security 
checking" of any system code, possibly by JIT'ing it or just interpreting 
it, since it can't let the kernel run natively with privileges. That's 
what VMware does too, since older CPU's don't have virtualization support 
for ring0 programs.

And _that_ is presumably buggy, and never learnt about the "new" 
instructions in the PPro.

		Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/