[PATCH 12/13] dm: reject I/O violating new queue limits

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Kiyoshi Ueda
Date: Friday, September 12, 2008 - 7:46 am

This patch detects requests violating the queue limitations
and rejects them.

The same limitation checks are done when requests are submitted
to the queue by blk_submit_request().
However, such violation can happen if a table is swapped and
the queue limitations are shrunk while some requests are
in the queue.

Since struct request is a reliable one in the block layer and
device drivers, dispatching such requests is pretty dangerous.
(e.g. it may cause kernel panic easily.)
So avoid to dispatch such problematic requests in request-based dm.


Signed-off-by: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

Index: 2.6.27-rc6/drivers/md/dm.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.27-rc6.orig/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ 2.6.27-rc6/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1469,6 +1469,30 @@ static void map_request(struct dm_target
 
 	tio->ti = ti;
 	atomic_inc(&md->pending);
+
+	/*
+	 * Although submitted requests to the md->queue are checked against
+	 * the table/queue limitations at the submission time, the limitations
+	 * may be changed by a table swapping while those already checked
+	 * requests are in the md->queue.
+	 * If the limitations have been shrunk in such situations, we may be
+	 * dispatching requests violating the current limitations here.
+	 * Since struct request is a reliable one in the block-layer
+	 * and device drivers, dispatching such requests is dangerous.
+	 * (e.g. it may cause kernel panic easily.)
+	 * Avoid to dispatch such problematic requests in request-based dm.
+	 *
+	 * Since dm_kill_request() decrements the md->pending, this have to
+	 * be done after incrementing the md->pending.
+	 */
+	r = blk_rq_check_limits(rq->q, rq);
+	if (unlikely(r)) {
+		DMWARN("violating the queue limitation. the limitation may be"
+		       " shrunk while there are some requests in the queue.");
+		dm_kill_request(clone, r);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	r = ti->type->map_rq(ti, clone, &tio->info);
 	switch (r) {
 	case DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED:
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 00/13] request-based dm-multipath, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:38 am)
[PATCH 01/13] block: add request update interface, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:40 am)
[PATCH 02/13] block: add request submission interface, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:41 am)
[PATCH 03/13] mm: lld busy status exporting interface, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:42 am)
[PATCH 04/13] scsi: exports busy status, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:43 am)
[PATCH 06/13] dm: remove unused DM_WQ_FLUSH_ALL, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:44 am)
[PATCH 07/13] dm: tidy local_init, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:44 am)
[PATCH 08/13] dm: add kmem_cache for request-based dm, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:45 am)
[PATCH 11/13] dm: enable request-based dm, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:46 am)
[PATCH 12/13] dm: reject I/O violating new queue limits, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:46 am)
[PATCH 13/13] dm-mpath: convert to request-based, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Fri Sep 12, 7:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 00/13] request-based dm-multipath, Jens Axboe, (Sun Sep 14, 6:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 02/13] block: add request submission interface, Kiyoshi Ueda, (Tue Sep 16, 11:12 am)