[RFC] [PATCH 3/9] memcg: move_account between groups

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 4:14 am

This patch provides a function to move account information of a page between
mem_cgroups.

This moving of page_cgroup is done under
 - the page is locked.
 - lru_lock of source/destination mem_cgroup is held.

Then, a routine which touches pc->mem_cgroup without page_lock() should
confirm pc->mem_cgroup is still valid or not. Typlical code can be following.

(while page is not under lock_page())
	mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
	mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc)
	spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock);
	if (pc->mem_cgroup == mem)
		...../* some list handling */
	spin_unlock_irq(&mz->lru_lock);

If you find page_cgroup from mem_cgroup's LRU under mz->lru_lock, you don't
have to worry about anything.

Changelong: (v2) -> (v3)
  - added lock_page_cgroup().
  - splitted out from new-force-empty patch.
  - added how-to-use text.
  - fixed race in __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common().

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

---
 mm/memcontrol.c |   74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: mmtom-2.6.27-rc5+/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmtom-2.6.27-rc5+.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmtom-2.6.27-rc5+/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struc
 void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru)
 {
 	struct page_cgroup *pc;
+	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -446,9 +447,14 @@ void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *
 
 	pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
 	if (pc) {
+		mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
 		mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
-		__mem_cgroup_move_lists(pc, lru);
+		/*
+		 * check against the race with move_account.
+		 */
+		if (likely(mem == pc->mem_cgroup))
+			__mem_cgroup_move_lists(pc, lru);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
 	}
 	unlock_page_cgroup(page);
@@ -569,6 +575,67 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(u
 	return nr_taken;
 }
 
+/**
+ * mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page
+ * @page ... the target page of being moved.
+ * @pc   ... page_cgroup of the page.
+ * @from ... mem_cgroup which the page is moved from.
+ * @to   ... mem_cgroup which the page is moved to.
+ *
+ * The caller must confirm following.
+ * 1. lock the page by lock_page().
+ * 2. disable irq.
+ * 3. lru_lock of old mem_cgroup should be held.
+ * 4. pc is guaranteed to be valid and on mem_cgroup's LRU.
+ *
+ * Because we cannot call try_to_free_page() here, the caller must guarantee
+ * this moving of change never fails. Currently this is called only against
+ * root cgroup, which has no limitation of resource.
+ * Returns 0 at success, returns 1 at failure.
+ */
+int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page *page, struct page_cgroup *pc,
+	struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to)
+{
+	struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *from_mz, *to_mz;
+	int nid, zid;
+	int ret = 1;
+
+	VM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+	VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
+
+	nid = page_to_nid(page);
+	zid = page_zonenum(page);
+	from_mz =  mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(from, nid, zid);
+	to_mz =  mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(to, nid, zid);
+
+	if (res_counter_charge(&to->res, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+		/* Now, we assume no_limit...no failure here. */
+		return ret;
+	}
+	if (try_lock_page_cgroup(page))
+		return ret;
+
+	if (page_get_page_cgroup(page) != pc)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (spin_trylock(&to_mz->lru_lock)) {
+		__mem_cgroup_remove_list(from_mz, pc);
+		css_put(&from->css);
+		res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE);
+		pc->mem_cgroup = to;
+		css_get(&to->css);
+		__mem_cgroup_add_list(to_mz, pc);
+		ret = 0;
+		spin_unlock(&to_mz->lru_lock);
+	} else {
+		res_counter_uncharge(&to->res, PAGE_SIZE);
+	}
+out:
+	unlock_page_cgroup(page);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Charge the memory controller for page usage.
  * Return
@@ -761,16 +828,24 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page
 	if ((ctype == MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED)
 	    && ((PageCgroupCache(pc) || page_mapped(page))))
 		goto unlock;
-
+retry:
+	mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
 	mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
+	if (ctype == MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_MAPPED &&
+	    unlikely(mem != pc->mem_cgroup)) {
+		/* MAPPED account can be done without lock_page().
+		   Check race with mem_cgroup_move_account() */
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
+		goto retry;
+	}
 	__mem_cgroup_remove_list(mz, pc);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
 
 	page_assign_page_cgroup(page, NULL);
 	unlock_page_cgroup(page);
 
-	mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
+
 	res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
 	css_put(&mem->css);
 

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC] [PATCH 0/9] remove page_cgroup pointer (with some e ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:08 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 1/9] memcg:make root no limit, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:11 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 2/9] memcg: atomic page_cgroup flags, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:13 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 3/9] memcg: move_account between groups, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:14 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 4/9] memcg: new force empty, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:16 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 5/9] memcg: set mapping null before uncharge, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:17 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 6/9] memcg: optimize stat, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:18 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 7/9] memcg: charge likely success, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:20 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 8/9] memcg: remove page_cgroup pointer from m ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:22 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 9/9] memcg: percpu page cgroup lookup cache, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 4:24 am)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 3/9] memcg: move_account between groups, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Sep 11, 9:36 pm)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/9] remove page_cgroup pointer (with so ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Sep 12, 2:35 am)
Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/9] remove page_cgroup pointer (with so ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Sep 12, 3:18 am)
memcg: lazy_lru (was Re: [RFC] [PATCH 8/9] memcg: remove p ..., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Sep 16, 5:13 am)
[RFC][PATCH 10/9] get/put page at charge/uncharge, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Sep 16, 5:17 am)
[RFC][PATCH 11/9] lazy lru free vector for memcg, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Sep 16, 5:19 am)
[RFC] [PATCH 12/9] lazy lru add vie per cpu vector for memcg., KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Tue Sep 16, 5:21 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 11/9] lazy lru free vector for memcg, Pavel Emelyanov, (Tue Sep 16, 5:23 am)
Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 11/9] lazy lru free vector for memcg, kamezawa.hiroyu, (Tue Sep 16, 6:02 am)