Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 2:53 am

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:


Andrew, are you fine with that approach too?

Also, i dont see Andrew's signoffs in the patches, and that's the true 
path of these patches which should be preserved: you => -mm => -tip.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Sep 11, 1:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Sep 11, 2:53 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Thu Sep 11, 3:03 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Andrew Morton, (Thu Sep 11, 3:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Ralf Baechle, (Thu Sep 11, 4:50 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Sep 11, 4:56 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Sep 11, 9:06 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Sep 11, 9:08 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Maciej W. Rozycki, (Thu Sep 11, 9:17 am)