hello mauro, Mauro Carvalho Chehab schrieb:how is the actual state of his proposal? with whom? the linuxtv developers or with an attending audience? i havent been on the list and that active since the "nearly two years war" begun, thus i am not the one to ack or nack in this pull request. what i did in the past was just watching what was happening and what was taking progress - even if it is slow. users on the linuxtv list started to ask over and over again, when multiproto is going to be merged. vdr started to support it in a kind of experiment. due to the lack of spare time and devices :) i do not actually know how productive the vdr multiproto implementation is, but we should not start the whole discussions again. if we do not merge multiproto now, we will never do it, i am afraid. for the future of this project it is more than neccessary to get some progress. if there are no serious objections to multiproto, mauro, please pull/merge it within the next few days. to wait until the end of september is time spending without any sense. regards marcel --
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 12/13] syslets: x86: optimized copy_uatom() |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 017/196] aoechr: Convert from class_device to device |
| Yinghai Lu | Re: 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
