On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 11:38 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
quoted text
> On Tuesday 26 August 2008 01:56:30 Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 14:33 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Can you hash the format string to generate the id?  6 hex digits should
> > > be enough, and your tool can check for clashes.  As it's bad form to have
> > > identical strings for different semantics anyway, this seems to make
> > > sense.
> >
> > If we go with hashes there is one more thing: kmsg(0, <string>)
> > The variant where we manually assign the message ids knows about the
> > "special" id 0. There is no documentation required for id 0 and none is
> > wanted. If we replace the manual ids with hashes this will get lost. You
> > could argue that a kmsg with id 0 is a normal printk so why not just use
> > printk? What is lost is the information that this printk has been found
> > to be not important enough to be documented.
> 
> Hmm, #define KERN_IGNORE KERN_DEBUG?

Hmm, shouldn't KERN_xxx levels be independent of the special id 0? 

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/