Re: [RFC PATCH] cleanup Serial ATA and Parallel ATA Kconfig

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Krzysztof Halasa
Date: Friday, August 8, 2008 - 3:58 pm

Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au> writes:


As noted, it's both PATA and SATA. People searching for PATA-only PIIX
support may have trouble locating it under SATA.

Why not remove ATA SFF support visual option (or leave it for optional
off-tree drivers only, if it makes sense) and SELECT it when any
driver using it is selected? I'm not sure that users know they need
SFF, or what's that.

I think I would also ask for PATA and for SATA first:

[*] PATA support
[*] SATA support
... PATA drivers if "PATA support" is selected
... SATA drivers if "SATA support" is selected
... PIIX is PATA and/or SATA support is selected

I guess all PATA and/or SATA drivers in a single sorted list (so PIIX
doesn't break ordering).
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
worth separating serial from parallel ATA kernel options?, Robert P. J. Day, (Fri Aug 8, 9:32 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH] cleanup Serial ATA and Parallel ATA Kconfig, Krzysztof Halasa, (Fri Aug 8, 3:58 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] cleanup Serial ATA and Parallel ATA Kconfig, Robert P. J. Day, (Fri Aug 8, 4:13 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] cleanup Serial ATA and Parallel ATA Kconfig, Robert P. J. Day, (Sat Aug 9, 3:39 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH] cleanup Serial ATA and Parallel ATA Kconfig, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sat Aug 9, 5:04 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH] cleanup Serial ATA and Parallel ATA Kconfig, Mikael Pettersson, (Sat Aug 9, 5:36 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH] cleanup Serial ATA and Parallel ATA Kconfig, Krzysztof Halasa, (Sat Aug 9, 12:12 pm)