Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> writes: Hopefully nobody puts a printk into call_rcu now... Also I'm not sure if there wouldn't be livelocks if someone puts printk into some other parts of RCU (e.g. each RCU adding more RCU events -- haven't checked that in detail so I might be wrong) So you just trade one "hands off" part to another.How about a big comment describing why you do this? And you should add comments to all the new hands-off parts where printk is not allowed now. -Andi --
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 0/8] IO queuing and complete affinity |
| Nicholas A. Bellinger | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Robin Lee Powell | NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested. |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [crash] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000... |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 19/37] dccp: Header option insertion routine for feature-negotiation |
| Gary Thomas | Marvell 88E609x switch? |
| Jamie Lokier | Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 |
| Jan Kara | [PATCH 10/16] ext4: Remove syncing logic from ext4_file_write |
| Jack Stone | Re: Versioning file system |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 8/8] vm: Add an tuning knob for vm.max_writeback_pages |
