Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq->lock and xtime lock

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Friday, August 8, 2008 - 6:46 am

/me tatoos on forehead: 'quilt refresh' before posting!!

On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 15:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Subject: printk: robustify printk wakeup behaviour

The klogd wakeup in the printk patch can cause deadlocks when holding the
rq->lock and or xtime_lock for writing.

Avoid doing the wakeup under certain conditions and delay it to the next jiffy
tick.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 include/linux/kernel.h   |    4 +++
 include/linux/seqlock.h  |    5 ++++
 kernel/printk.c          |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    2 -
 kernel/timer.c           |    1 
 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/kernel.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ extern struct ratelimit_state printk_rat
 extern int printk_ratelimit(void);
 extern bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies,
 				   unsigned int interval_msec);
+extern void printk_tick(void);
+extern int printk_needs_cpu(int);
 #else
 static inline int vprintk(const char *s, va_list args)
 	__attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 0)));
@@ -211,6 +213,8 @@ static inline int printk_ratelimit(void)
 static inline bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies, \
 					  unsigned int interval_msec)	\
 		{ return false; }
+static inline void printk_tick(void) { }
+static inline int printk_needs_cpu(int) { return 0; }
 #endif
 
 extern void asmlinkage __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/seqlock.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline void write_sequnlock(seqlo
 	spin_unlock(&sl->lock);
 }
 
+static inline int seq_is_writelocked(seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+	return spin_is_locked(&sl->lock);
+}
+
 static inline int write_tryseqlock(seqlock_t *sl)
 {
 	int ret = spin_trylock(&sl->lock);
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/printk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/printk.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/printk.c
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/bootmem.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 
@@ -982,12 +984,56 @@ int is_console_locked(void)
 	return console_locked;
 }
 
-void wake_up_klogd(void)
+static int printk_pending;
+
+void __wake_up_klogd(void)
 {
+	if (printk_pending)
+		printk_pending = 0;
+
 	if (!oops_in_progress && waitqueue_active(&log_wait))
 		wake_up_interruptible(&log_wait);
 }
 
+int printk_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+	if (!printk_pending)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Stop the last awake CPU from entering NOHZ state when there still
+	 * is a klogd to kick.
+	 */
+	return (cpus_weight(cpu_online_map) - cpus_weight(nohz_cpu_mask)) == 1;
+}
+
+void printk_tick(void)
+{
+	if (unlikely(printk_pending))
+		__wake_up_klogd();
+}
+
+static int printk_do_wakeup(void)
+{
+	if (irqs_disabled())
+		return 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HRTICK
+	if (seq_is_writelocked(&xtime_lock))
+		return 0;
+#endif
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+void wake_up_klogd(void)
+{
+	if (printk_do_wakeup())
+		__wake_up_klogd();
+	else
+		printk_pending = 1;
+}
+
 /**
  * release_console_sem - unlock the console system
  *
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidl
 	next_jiffies = get_next_timer_interrupt(last_jiffies);
 	delta_jiffies = next_jiffies - last_jiffies;
 
-	if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu))
+	if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu) || printk_needs_cpu(cpu))
 		delta_jiffies = 1;
 	/*
 	 * Do not stop the tick, if we are only one off
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/timer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/timer.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/timer.c
@@ -978,6 +978,7 @@ void update_process_times(int user_tick)
 	run_local_timers();
 	if (rcu_pending(cpu))
 		rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user_tick);
+	printk_tick();
 	scheduler_tick();
 	run_posix_cpu_timers(p);
 }


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Mar 24, 5:24 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Marcin Slusarz, (Mon Mar 24, 7:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Mar 24, 10:58 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Mar 24, 11:15 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Mar 24, 11:16 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Andrew Morton, (Mon Mar 24, 11:57 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 6:30 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq->lock and xtime lock, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 6:46 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 8, 9:41 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 10:10 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 8, 10:25 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 10:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 8, 10:48 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq-&gt;lock and xtime lock, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Aug 8, 10:52 am)
[PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 11:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 8, 11:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 11:33 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Andrew Morton, (Fri Aug 8, 12:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 12:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Andrew Morton, (Fri Aug 8, 12:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 12:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 12:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Paul E. McKenney, (Fri Aug 8, 1:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Paul E. McKenney, (Fri Aug 8, 1:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Paul E. McKenney, (Fri Aug 8, 1:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Peter Zijlstra, (Fri Aug 8, 1:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Andrew Morton, (Fri Aug 8, 1:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Steven Rostedt, (Fri Aug 8, 1:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 8, 1:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Andrew Morton, (Fri Aug 8, 2:13 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Andi Kleen, (Fri Aug 8, 2:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, David Miller, (Fri Aug 8, 4:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Paul E. McKenney, (Fri Aug 8, 5:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Aug 11, 3:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Andi Kleen, (Mon Aug 11, 4:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Aug 11, 4:04 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Aug 11, 4:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Andi Kleen, (Mon Aug 11, 4:42 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Aug 11, 4:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Aug 11, 5:02 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Andi Kleen, (Mon Aug 11, 5:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Aug 11, 5:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Paul E. McKenney, (Mon Aug 11, 6:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Valdis.Kletnieks, (Mon Aug 11, 7:15 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Andi Kleen, (Mon Aug 11, 7:29 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Steven Rostedt, (Mon Aug 11, 7:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Paul E. McKenney, (Mon Aug 11, 9:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Jiri Kosina, (Wed Aug 20, 5:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Aug 20, 5:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] printk: robustify printk, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Aug 20, 6:40 am)