Re: why are namespaces required?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Friday, August 8, 2008 - 4:29 am

Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> writes:

Fully agreed. Probably a lot of these CONFIG options should be just dropped.
They are quite user unfriendly with very little gain.

It seems like there is unbounded growth in different name space options
which also implies unbounded CONFIG growth. At least they should be all
consolidated into a single CONFIG.

-Andi

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
why are namespaces required?, david, (Thu Aug 7, 5:54 pm)
Re: why are namespaces required?, david, (Thu Aug 7, 6:11 pm)
Re: why are namespaces required?, Alexey Dobriyan, (Thu Aug 7, 6:33 pm)
Re: why are namespaces required?, Andi Kleen, (Fri Aug 8, 4:29 am)
Re: why are namespaces required?, david, (Fri Aug 8, 8:08 am)