Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/7] mm: fix mm_take_all_locks() locking order

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrea Arcangeli
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008 - 6:34 pm

On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 11:46:42PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

Correction: 57 are the vmas but counting with something less coarse
than grep lib |wc -l, there are less inodes backing those vmas than
the nesting limit, so 8/7 is ok for now (as long as check_deadlock
exists at least).

Thanks again!
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Aug 4, 6:03 am)
[RFC][PATCH 8/7] lockdep: annotate mm_take_all_locks(), Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Aug 7, 4:25 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/7] mm: fix mm_take_all_locks() locking order, Andrea Arcangeli, (Thu Aug 7, 6:34 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Aug 11, 3:08 am)