> Nick Piggin wrote:
quoted text
>
>> OK thanks for the info. I don't actually know debugger code as I
>> said, so I wasn't against merging mdb if it offers things that
>> kgdb fundamentally cannot.
>>
>> If so, then ensuring clean interfaces indeed would seem like a
>> good first step to getting it merged.
>
> The competing implementation is kdb not kgdb. kgdb is just a stub for
> remote
> debugging using gdb. kdb is an in-kernel debugger like the one proposed
> here.
>

I don't consider them competing, just different tools for people from
different development backgrounds.  GNU and DOS/Windows.

Jeff

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/