jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com wrote:
quoted text
> rspin locks are for these types of cases -- so if I fault on the same
> processor I took the lock on it just bumps a counter -- yes, it is atomic
> and SMP safe to do it this way.

Only if all contexts which take rlocks are not preemptible.  Which I 
don't know whether they are; I'm just a driver guy.  You use 
spin_lock_irqsave() rather than plain spin_lock() though, which 
indicates that you want to be able to take the locks from preemptible 
contexts too.  In that case, your accessors are subtly buggy.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- --===
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/